The Anonymous group should
answer TWO of the following:
Q1: What is Cavendish’s
view of men in the story? Both suitors are said to be vain and debauched, and
both act cowardly toward the Young Lady in the story. Even her uncle, for all
his open-mindedness, threatens her by saying, “if you consent not, never come
near me more, for I will disclaim all the interest of an uncle, and become your
enemy” (28). Is she satirizing the idea of male protectors in this story? Or is
this simply a realistic portrayal of men who mean well, but often fail to do
the right thing (but can still be redeemed)?
Q2: What does this story
say about a woman’s coming-of-age in seventeenth-century England? What social conventions and rituals must she
follow? What taboos must she avoid? Why is it difficult for a girl raised in
isolation in the country to understand and follow these rules?
Q3: The Young Lady
ultimately wins her suit before the judges using what she claims is the “truth
of her cause,” and “the justness of my plea” (42). Are we meant to applaud her
use of rhetoric to win back her true love? Or is this her own ‘fall’ into
wickedness and sin? In other words, is she more honest or conniving in the
courtroom? Consider, too, that the Duke’s wife calls her a “crafty, flattering,
dissembling child” (40).
Q4: Is the moral of this
story to use your wit and intelligence to disobey your elders (who are blinded
by money and power)? Or is this moral to ignore your own thoughts and desires
and follow the advice of your parents/uncle? Which one does the Young Lady
ultimately seem to follow?
No comments:
Post a Comment